Spectral Atlas
A visual language for mapping learned recurrent mode families and tracking how they reorganize during training.
Independent sequence modeling research
Project SLSSM-01 studies recurrent language models with inspectable spectral dynamics. This public dossier presents the evidence, methods, and limitations; the implementation, weights, and training recipe remain private.
What we are publishing
A visual language for mapping learned recurrent mode families and tracking how they reorganize during training.
Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition (EDMD) compares measured trajectory behavior with learned internal dynamics as an interpretability lens.
A prompt-conditioned trace of mode usage during inference, labeled with illustrative token steps so the path can be read as a simulated prompt moving through mode neighborhoods.
Model class
The public name for Project SLSSM-01's model class is a stable linear spectral state-space language model. More precisely: Project SLSSM-01 uses a stable linear recurrent dynamics core, with nonlinear token drive, gating, and readout around that core. That distinction matters. The stable linear part is what makes the internal dynamics analyzable as modes; the surrounding learned components are what let those modes interact with language.
The recurrent state is constrained to avoid uncontrolled dynamical blow-up during training and inference.
The central state evolution is treated as a mode-based linear dynamical system.
The model can be analyzed through learned frequencies, decay behavior, and mode populations.
Nonlinear learned components drive and decode the stable state dynamics into token behavior.
Evidence without the recipe
The charts below summarize the Project SLSSM-01 v3 short-context training run. They show run scale, loss movement, dynamical agreement, signed phase behavior, and the next open problem: longer memory.
Rounded final checkpoint result from the analyzed v3 short run.
Twenty-batch validation probe at the final analyzed checkpoint.
Mean nearest-distance improved from the early checkpoint to final.
Final modes retained both positive and negative phase rotation.
Loss moved down across the run rather than stalling at the early spectral organization stage.
Independent trajectory analysis stayed close to the learned spectral structure after the early run.
The model kept meaningful population on both rotation directions, which is exactly what signed phase was meant to preserve.
The short-context model worked, but the near-unit slow population remained sparse. That gives the next run a clear target instead of a vague hope.
| Checkpoint | Tokens | Best loss | Validation mean | EDMD mean distance | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30k | 3.9B | 4.03 | 3.91 | 0.0113 | early organization |
| 102k | 13.4B | 3.38 | 3.40 | 0.0079 | agreement tightened |
| 204k | 26.7B | 3.24 | 3.28 | 0.0077 | stable dynamics |
| 250k | 32.8B | 3.16 | 3.27 | 0.0078 | short-context finish |
The downloadable CSV mirrors the public tables. The research note defines each metric, states the evidence boundary, and lists outcomes that would weaken the current interpretation.
A standalone EDMD demonstration on public Pythia-14m training checkpoints: a pre-specified protocol with dated post-run amendments, pinned model commits, shuffled-pairing and persistence controls, CPU-only, a few seconds per run. It validates the measurement method on a public model; it does not validate this model's claims.
These author-reported summaries are intentionally rounded and come from one analyzed run. They are not an external replication or a claim of benchmark leadership. The public note documents the disclosure and validation boundary. Read the public research note.
Research visualization
This page uses generated public data to demonstrate the type of analysis we perform. The traced path is labeled with example prompt tokens so the viewer can understand what is being simulated. No Project SLSSM-01 weights, activations, or tokenizer details are shown.
Prompt traces show how words can move through different mode neighborhoods. In the research workflow, real prompts can be compared across checkpoints without reducing the model to a single loss number.
The research question is whether measured dynamics agree with learned internal structure. The public chart shows the idea while omitting the implementation-specific transformation path.
Research stance
Loss curves matter, but they do not tell the whole story. We are interested in how memory, phase, and mode participation evolve inside a model while it learns.
We developed a proprietary recurrent spectral language model whose internal dynamics can be tracked across training. Our analysis revealed a shortage of long-retention modes consistent with the model's observed long-memory limitations. This finding informed a follow-up training plan designed to strengthen long-timescale memory while preserving short-context performance.
Research team


Research Collaborator / Academic Advisor
Research collaborator and academic partner. Affiliation listed for identification: Louisiana Tech University.
Project SLSSM-01 is an independent research effort. Louisiana Tech University affiliation is provided for identification only and does not imply institutional endorsement.
Questions, corrections, or collaboration: contact@trinity-research.com